Answer Mark Guidance
1 Evaluate the interpretations in both of the two
passages and explain which you think is more
convincing as an explanation of the economic
relationship between Britain and the American
colonies
...
Answer Mark Guidance
1 Evaluate the interpretations in both of the two
passages and explain which you think is more
convincing as an explanation of the economic
relationship between Britain and the American
colonies in the period from 1660 to 1713
• In locating the Interpretations within the
wider historical debate, answer might argue
that Interpretation A puts forward the view that
the economic relationship created by the
Navigation Acts was beneficial for the
colonies.
• In evaluating Interpretation A, answers
might argue that this view is valid as diversity
was encouraged which led to the
development of cash cropping in the colonies,
which stimulated agricultural development.
• Answers might argue that Interpretation A is
valid as the colonists enjoyed a protected
market in Britain and its Empire.
• Answers might argue A is valid as American
shipping developed and benefited from the
exclusion of foreign ships from colonial trade.
• Answers might argue that Interpretation A is
not valid as the economy developed because
the mercantilist system was not well enforced.
• In locating the Interpretations within the
wider historical debate, answers might
argue that Interpretation B puts forward that
the economic relationship was one-sided and
30 • No set answer is expected
• At Level 5 and above answers will evaluate both
interpretations, locating them within the wider
historical debate about the issue and using their own
knowledge, and reach a balanced judgement as to
which they consider the most convincing about the
issue in the question.
• To be valid, judgements must be supported by
relevant and accurate material.
• Knowledge must not be credited in isolation, it
should only be credited where it is used to analyse
and evaluate the interpretations, in line with
descriptions in the levels mark schemeY311/01 Mark Scheme October 2021
4
2*
that the Navigation Acts had a serious
economic impact on the colonies.
• In evaluating Interpretation B, answers
might argue it is valid as a series of Acts were
passed between 1651 and 1673.
• Answers might argue that it is valid as there
were a number of enumerated goods that had
to come to Britain first.
• Answers might argue Interpretation B is valid
as reforms were made to the Charters of
Massachusetts by Charles II and James II.
• Answers might argue that Interpretation B is
valid as there was a strong belief in the
doctrine of mercantilism.
• Answers might argue that Interpretation B is
not valid as the Acts were not well enforced.
• Answers might argue that Interpretation B is
valid as wars were fought to destroy the Dutch
carrying trade.
How important were trading and chartered companies
in British exploitation of its colonies in the period
from 1558 to 1783?
• In arguing that trading and chartered
companies were important, it might be
argued that Elizabeth I gave a charter to the
East India Company in 1600 to develop trade
with India.
• Answers might consider that the Virginia
[Show More]