Subject-specific Marking Instructions
INTRODUCTION
Your first task as an Examiner is to become thoroughly familiar with the material on which the examination depends. This material includes:
the specification, espec
...
Subject-specific Marking Instructions
INTRODUCTION
Your first task as an Examiner is to become thoroughly familiar with the material on which the examination depends. This material includes:
the specification, especially the assessment objectives
the question paper and its rubrics
the mark scheme.
You should ensure that you have copies of these materials.
You should ensure also that you are familiar with the administrative procedures related to the marking process. These are set out in the OCR
booklet Instructions for Examiners. If you are examining for the first time, please read carefully Appendix 5 Introduction to Script Marking:
Notes for New Examiners.
Please ask for help or guidance whenever you need it. Your first point of contact is your Team Leader.H481/02 Mark Scheme Practice Paper
6
USING THE MARK SCHEME
Please study this Mark Scheme carefully. The Mark Scheme is an integral part of the process that begins with the setting of the question paper and
ends with the awarding of grades. Question papers and Mark Schemes are developed in association with each other so that issues of
differentiation and positive achievement can be addressed from the very start.
This Mark Scheme is a working document; it is not exhaustive; it does not provide ‘correct’ answers. The Mark Scheme can only provide ‘best
guesses’ about how the question will work out, and it is subject to revision after we have looked at a wide range of scripts.
The Examiners’ Standardisation Meeting will ensure that the Mark Scheme covers the range of candidates’ responses to the questions, and that all
Examiners understand and apply the Mark Scheme in the same way. The Mark Scheme will be discussed and amended at the meeting, and
administrative procedures will be confirmed. Co-ordination scripts will be issued at the meeting to exemplify aspects of candidates’ responses and
achievements; the co-ordination scripts then become part of this Mark Scheme.
Before the Standardisation Meeting, you should read and mark in pencil a number of scripts, in order to gain an impression of the range of
responses and achievement that may be expected.
In your marking, you will encounter valid responses which are not covered by the Mark Scheme: these responses must be credited. You will
encounter answers which fall outside the ‘target range’ of Bands for the paper which you are marking. Please mark these answers according to the
marking criteria.
Please read carefully all the scripts in your allocation and make every effort to look positively for achievement throughout the ability range. Always
be prepared to use the full range of marks.H481/02 Mark Scheme Practice Paper
7
LEVELS OF RESPONSE QUESTIONS:
The indicative content indicates the expected parameters for candidates’ answers, but be prepared to recognise and credit unexpected approaches
where they show relevance.
Using ‘best-fit’, decide first which set of level descriptors best describes the overall quality of the answer. Once the level is located, adjust the mark
concentrating on features of the answer which make it stronger or weaker following the guidelines for refinement.
Highest mark: If clear evidence of all the qualities in the level descriptors is shown, the HIGHEST Mark should be awarded.
Lowest mark: If the answer shows the candidate to be borderline (i.e. they have achieved all the qualities of the levels below and show limited
evidence of meeting the criteria of the level in question) the LOWEST mark should be awarded.
Middle mark: This mark should be used for candidates who are secure in the level. They are not ‘borderline’ but they have only achieved some of
the qualities in the level descriptors.
Be prepared to use the full range of marks. Do not reserve (e.g.) highest level marks ‘in case’ something turns up of a quality you have not yet
seen. If an answer gives clear evidence of the qualities described in the level descriptors, reward appropriately.
Quality of extended response will be assessed in questions marked with an (*). Quality of extended response is not attributed to any single
assessment objective but instead is assessed against the entire response for the question.H481/02 Mark Scheme Practice Paper
8
AO1 AO2 AO3 Quality of extended response
Comprehensive A wide range of
detailed and accurate
knowledge that
demonstrates fully
developed
understanding that
shows full relevance to
the demands of the
question.
Precision in the use of
question terminology.
Knowledge and understanding
shown is consistently applied to
the context of the question, in
order to form a:
clear, developed and convincing
analysis that is fully accurate.
clear, developed and convincing
interpretation that is fully
accurate.
detailed and substantiated
evaluation that offers secure
judgements leading to rational
conclusions that are evidence
based.
Quantitative, qualitative
and/or fieldwork skills are
used in a consistently
appropriate and effective
way and with a high degree
of competence and
precision.
There is a well-developed line of
reasoning which is clear and
logically structured. The
information presented is relevant
and substantiated.
Thorough A range of detailed and
accurate knowledge
that demonstrates welldeveloped
understanding that is
relevant to the
demands of the
question.
Generally precise in the
use of question
terminology.
Knowledge and understanding
shown is mainly applied to the
context of the question, in order to
form a:
clear and developed analysis that
shows accuracy.
clear and developed interpretation
that shows accuracy.
detailed evaluation that offers
generally secure judgements, with
some link between rational
conclusions and evidence.
Quantitative, qualitative
and/or fieldwork skills are
used in a suitable way and
with a good level of
competence and precision.
There is a line of reasoning
presented with some structure.
The information presented is in
the most-part relevant and
supported by some evidence.
[Show More]