Business Law > CASE STUDY > MG 260 unit 1 case study (Case: Gonzales vs. Raich) | GRADED A (All)

MG 260 unit 1 case study (Case: Gonzales vs. Raich) | GRADED A

Document Content and Description Below

MG 260 unit 1 case study (Case: Gonzales vs. Raich) Case: Gonzales vs. Raich • The Parties Who is the plaintiff? The defendant? The appellant? The appellee? • The Plaintiff in this case are ... California residents Angel Raich and Diane Monson. • The defendant in this case is Attorney General of California Alberto Gonzales. • The appellee in this case is Alberto Gonzales (Langvardt, 2013). • What is the history of the case? Possible questions to answer would be: Who won at trial court? Who won at the lower appellate level? Who won in this decision? Please note that this is the history of the case in court—not the facts of the case. • The Attorney General of California, Alberto Gonzales, wont at trial court, lower appellate level and U.S Supreme Court level. • A request for a preliminary injunction was denied by the Federal Supreme Court. • A prelim injunction barring enforcement of the CSA Angel Raich and Diane Monson was issued by the lower court as a directive from The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [Show More]

Last updated: 2 years ago

Preview 1 out of 3 pages

Buy Now

Instant download

We Accept: