Mark Scheme (Results)
Summer 2023
Pearson Edexcel GCSE
In English Language 2.0 (1EN2)
Paper 1: Non-Fiction Texts2
Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s lar
...
Mark Scheme (Results)
Summer 2023
Pearson Edexcel GCSE
In English Language 2.0 (1EN2)
Paper 1: Non-Fiction Texts2
Edexcel and BTEC Qualifications
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body.
We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and
specific programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites
at www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the
details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus
Pearson: helping people progress, everywhere
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone
progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of
people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150 years,
and by working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international
reputation for our commitment to high standards and raising achievement through
innovation in education. Find out more about how we can help you and your students at:
www.pearson.com/uk
Summer 2023
Question Paper Log Number P73803
Publications Code 1EN0_02_2306_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 20233
General marking guidance
• All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the last
candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the first.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded for
what they have shown they can do, rather than be penalised for omissions.
• When a candidate writes more points than required by the questions, the examiner
will mark in order of appearance up to the number of points required by the
question.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme – not according to their
perception of where the grade boundaries may lie.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners should
always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark scheme.
Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the candidate’s response
is not worthy of credit, according to the mark scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by
which marks will be awarded and exemplification/indicative content will not be
exhaustive. However, different examples of responses will be provided at
standardisation.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme to a candidate’s
response, a senior examiner must be consulted before a mark is given.
• Crossed-out work should be marked unless the candidate has replaced it with an
alternative response.
Marking guidance for levels-based mark schemes
How to award marks
The indicative content provides examples of how students will meet each skill
assessed in the question. The levels descriptors and indicative content reflect the
relative weighting of each skill within each mark level.
Finding the right level
The first stage is to decide which level the answer should be placed in. To do this,
use a ‘best-fit’ approach, deciding which level most closely describes the quality of
the answer. Answers can display characteristics from more than one level, and
where this happens markers must use the guidance below and their professional
judgement to decide which level is most appropriate.
Placing a mark within a level
After a level has been decided on, the next stage is to decide on the mark within the level.
The instructions below tell you how to reward responses within a level. However, where a4
level has specific guidance about how to place an answer within a level, always follow
that guidance.
Statements relating to the treatment of students who do not fully meet the
requirements of the question are also shown in the indicative content section of each
levels-based mark scheme. These statements should be considered alongside the levels
descriptors.
Markers should be prepared to use the full range of marks available in a level and not
restrict marks to the middle. Markers should start at the middle of the level (or the
upper-middle mark if there is an even number of marks) and then move the mark up
or down to find the best mark.
To do this, they should take into account how far the answer meets the requirements
of the level:
● if it meets the requirements fully, markers should be prepared to award full
marks within the level. The top mark in the level is used for answers that are as
good as can realistically be expected within that level
● if it only barely meets the requirements of the level, markers should consider
awarding marks at the bottom of the level. The bottom mark in the level is used
for answers that are the weakest that can be expected within that level
● the middle marks of the level are used for answers that have a reasonable match
to the descriptor. This might represent a balance between some characteristics
of the level that are fully met and others that are only barely met.
When a candidate has produced an answer that displays characteristics from more
than one level, examiners must use their professional judgement to decide if they have
covered enough of the higher-level descriptors to be awarded marks at the bottom of
the mark range in that higher level. If that is not the case, then the higher mark in the
lower level can be awarded.5
Paper 1 Mark scheme
The table below shows the number of raw marks allocated for each question in this mark
scheme.6
Paper 1 − Mark Scheme
The use of slashes is to show alternative responses and the use of brackets is to show possible,
but not required or expected, student responses.
Section A: Reading
Question
number
Answer Mark
1 AO1 (identify explicit information and ideas)
Accept any reasonable things the bicycle riders did, up to a maximum
of 4 marks.
Quotations and own words are acceptable.
Candidates may identify the following things:
● they displayed more energy (1)
● sprint (1)
● move out from the bunch (1)
● speed up (1)
● fall behind (1)
● ride for hours (1)
● average sixteen miles every sixty minutes (1)
● slow down (1)
● carry sponges (1)
● fall off (1)
● carry on after falling off (1)
● receive flowers (1)
● sprint (for a quarter of a mile) in recognition of the gift (1)
Do not credit any references to the image.
(4)7
N.B.: candidates may offer a range of evaluations of the success of the writer. All interpretations are
equally valid provided they are argued appropriately, supporting the points being made.
Question
number
Answer
2 AO4 (6 marks)
Candidates must give three reasons supported by evidence to access Level 3.
Do not credit:
• any reason/evidence that is not in lines 2-10
• any reference to the writer’s techniques that does not make a judgement on the success of the
text
• any references to the image.
Responses may include:
• the text starts positively by describing the effect of the crowd on the riders: ‘the greater the crowd
the more energy’ and the use of ‘greater’ and ‘more’ effectively suggests how big and lively the race
is
• the text successfully conveys that the entertainment will be non-stop ‘sprinting all the time’, which
would show readers that there will be constant amusement
• the writer successfully interests the reader by describing how the riders change their positions:
‘First one and then another’, ‘followed immediately’ and by suggesting some riders unexpectedly
become competitive, ‘suddenly awoke to the situation’, which would show how the race will be
thrilling and unpredictable
• the use of ‘fall hopelessly behind’ would engage readers in the excitement because audiences
watch events to see both winners and losers
• the text successfully uses time, ‘Hour after hour’, which shows how long the race is and tells the
reader how much there will be to see, and also how impressive the riders’ endurance is. This
would be entertaining to see as 19th century audiences were very interested in human endurance
(as are modern audiences)
• the writer successfully conveys that watching the riders’ performance would be entertaining, by
using the reference to ‘sixteen miles every sixty minutes’, which might surprise the readers and
make them want to watch such an event as the speed mentioned is quite impressive for the 19th
century
• the text is successful as it shows how spectators can see the contrasts in the pace of the race,
‘speed up’, ‘slow down’, which would be entertaining as there is always something different to see
• however, some readers may think the writer is not successful at capturing the excitement as
things happen very fast, ‘sprinting all the time’, and so it would not be very enjoyable to watch
• the text is unsuccessful in showing the readers how exciting
[Show More]