Module 4 Final Quiz: Economic Strategy and Negotiation Module 4 Final Quiz

Module 4 Final Quiz: Economic Strategy and Negotiation Module 4 Final Quiz Due No due date Points 20 Questions 20 Time Limit 60 Minutes Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 17 minutes 20 out of 20 ...

Module 4 Final Quiz: Economic Strategy and Negotiation Module 4 Final Quiz Due No due date Points 20 Questions 20 Time Limit 60 Minutes Attempt History Attempt Time Score LATEST Attempt 1 17 minutes 20 out of 20  Correct answers are hidden. Score for this quiz: 20 out of 20 Submitted May 2 at 16:23 This attempt took 17 minutes. Question 1 1 / 1 pts Doc and Brewster are in a negotiation over royalties. The negotiations proceed as follows. Doc can make an offer that is either high (H), medium (M) or low (L). Having received the offer, Brewster can either accept (A) or reject (R) any offer received. The payoffs are as follows. If an offer of H is accepted, the payoffs are (30, 8) to Doc and Brewster, respectively. If an offer of H is rejected, the payoffs are (18, 16). If an offer of M is made and accepted, the payoffs are (20, 8). If an M offer is rejected the payoffs are (5, 5). If a low offer is made and accepted the payoffs are (30, 5) and if an of L is rejected the payoffs are (10, 15). In the subgame perfect equilibrium outcome Brewster receives a payoff of . 8 Question 2 1 / 1 pts Chrissie owns a vintage guitar that she values at $0. Mark would like to buy the guitar and values it at $1000. The negotiations are as follows. Chrissie suggests a price to Mark. If Mark agrees trade takes place at the agreed price. If Mark rejects the offer, Mark buys an identical guitar from Angus for a price of $400 and Chrissie receives a payoff of $0. What is the outcome of the negotiations? Chrissie offers a price of $1000 and Mark accepts Chrissie offers a price of $400 and Mark accepts 02/05/2020 Module 4 Final Quiz: Economic Strategy and Negotiation https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/23912/quizzes/94190 2/9 Chrissie offers a price of $0 and Mark accepts Chrissie offers a price of $600 and Mark accepts. Chrissie offers a price of $500 and Mark rejects. Question 3 1 / 1 pts Chrissie owns a vintage guitar that she values at $0. Mark would like to buy the guitar and values it at $1000. The negotiations are as follows. Chrissie suggests a price to Mark. If Mark agrees trade takes place at the agreed price. If Mark rejects the offer, negotiations end and each party receives a payoff of $0. What is the outcome of the negotiations? Trade takes place at a price of $1000. Chrissie offers a price close to $1000 and Mark rejects the offer Mark rejects any offer Chrissie makes. Trade takes place at a price of $500 Trade takes place at a price of $0 Question 4 1 / 1 pts JJ and PW are in a negotiation that involves each party simultaneously choosing their strategy. JJ can either offer a high (H) or a low (L) price. PW can opt to Accept (A) or reject (R). If JJ opts for H and PW A, the payoffs are 6 to JJ and 4 to PW. If JJ opts for H and PW R, the payoffs are 4 to JJ and 6 to PW. If JJ goes L and PW A, the payoffs are 8 to JJ and 3 to PW. Finally, if JJ goes L and PW R, the payoffs are 7 and 5, to JJ and PW, respectively. Which of the following statements are true? The Nash equilibrium is (L, R) This negotiation resembles a prisoners’ dilemma. The Nash equilibrium is (H, A) JJ has a dominant strategy to set a high (H) price. The Nash equilibrium in the negotiation is (H, R). 02/05/2020 Module 4 Final Quiz: Economic Strategy and Negotiation https://canvas.sydney.edu.au/courses/23912/quizzes/94190 3/9 Question 5 1 / 1 pts Consider the CBA negotiating with Myer regarding the rate of interest for a loan. The CBA can offer any interest rate r between 0 and 10. If Myer accepts the payoff to the CBA is r, and the payoff to Myer is 10 – r. If Myer rejects the offer the payoffs are 0 to both parties. What is the strategy of Myer in any credible equilibrium? Accept any offer r ≤ 10. None of the answers are correct. Accept any offer r ≥ 10 Accept any offer r ≥ 0 Accept any offer provided r = 0 Question 6 1 / 1 pts Ainslie is in a team with Michelle and together they must produce a report for their boss. To determine who will do the work, they engage in the following negotiations: Ainslie can propose that either she does the work, or that Michelle does the work. Michelle can then accept or reject Ainslie’s offer. If Ainslie offers to do the work, and Michelle accepts this offer, Ainslie gets a payoff of 20 and Michelle a payoff of 40. If Michelle rejects this offer both get a payoff of 10. If Ainslie suggests Michelle do the work and Michelle accepts, the payoffs are 50 to Ainslie and 20 to Michelle. If Michelle rejects Ainslie’s suggestion that Michelle is the one who should complete the work, Ainslie has an opportunity to respond. At this juncture, Ainslie can opt not to do the work, and both workers get a payoff of 10. If Ainslie chooses to do the work, she receives a payoff of 15 and Michelle gets a return of 50. What is the outcome of this negotiation process? Ainslie suggests Michelle do the work, and Michelle accepts. Ainslie suggests Michelle do the work, Michelle refuses; Ainslie then chooses not to do the work. Ainslie suggests that she does the work herself, and Michelle refuses. Ainslie suggests she does the work, and Michelle accepts. Ainslie suggests Michelle do the work, and Michelle refuses; Ainslie then chooses to do the wor