NURSING NURS 4100_Week 4 Assignment_complete solution, Latest 2020/2021

NURS 4100 Week 4 Assignment APPENDIX F Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Quantitative Study APA Formatted Citation: (4 pts.) Answer Here: Bentlinger, L., Blanck, A., Donahue, M., Polito, C., & Stinger, K. (2014, March). A q ...

NURS 4100 Week 4 Assignment APPENDIX F Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Quantitative Study APA Formatted Citation: (4 pts.) Answer Here: Bentlinger, L., Blanck, A., Donahue, M., Polito, C., & Stinger, K. (2014, March). A quasi-experimental study to test a prevention bundle for catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(4), 101-108. Synopsis (16 pts.) 1. What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)? 2. How was the sample obtained? 3. What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used? 4. Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data (demographic or clinical profile and dropout rate)? 5. What methods were used to collect data (e.g., sequence, timing, types of data, and measures)? 6. Was an intervention tested? Answer Yes or No A. How was the sample size determined? B. Were patients randomly assigned to treatment groups? 7. What are the main findings of the study? (10 pts.) Credibility (14 pts.) Yes No Not Clear Is the study published in a source that required peer review? *Did the data obtained and the analysis conducted answer the research question? Were the measuring instruments reliable and valid? *Were important extraneous variables and bias controlled? *If an intervention was tested, answer the following five questions: Were participants randomly assigned to groups and were the two groups similar at the start (before the intervention)? Were the interventions well defined and consistently delivered? Were the groups treated equally other than the difference in interventions? If no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to detect a difference if one existed? If a difference was found, are you confident it was due to the intervention? Are the findings consistent with findings from other studies? Some No ARE THE FINDINGS CREDIBLE? Clinical Significance (6 pts.) 1. Note any difference in means, r2s, or measures of clinical effects (ABI, NNT, RR, OR) Yes No Not Clear *Is the target population clearly described? *Is the frequency, association, or treatment effect impressive enough for you to be confident that the finding would make a clinical difference if used as the basis for care? All Some No ARE THE FINDINGS CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT? Comments APPENDIX F Appraisal Guide: Findings of a Quantitative Study APA Formatted Citation: (4 pts.) Answer Here: Oman, K. S., Flynn, Fink, R., Schraeder, N., Hulett, T., Keech, T., & Wald, H. (2012). Nurse-directed Interventions to Reduce Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections. American Journal of Infection Control, 40(6), 548-553. Synopsis (16 pts.) 8. What was the purpose of the study (research questions, purposes, and hypotheses)? 9. How was the sample obtained? 10. What inclusion or exclusion criteria were used? 11. Who from the sample actually participated or contributed data (demographic or clinical profile and dropout rate)? 12. What methods were used to collect data (e.g., sequence, timing, types of data, and measures)? 13. Was an intervention tested? Answer Yes or No C. How was the sample size determined? D. Were patients randomly assigned to treatment groups? 14. What are the main findings of the study? (10 pts.) Credibility (14 pts.) Yes No Not Clear Is the study published in a source that required peer review? *Did the data obtained and the analysis conducted answer the research question? Were the measuring instruments reliable and valid? *Were important extraneous variables and bias controlled? *If an intervention was tested, answer the following five questions: Were participants randomly assigned to groups and were the two groups similar at the start (before the intervention)? Were the interventions well defined and consistently delivered? Were the groups treated equally other than the difference in interventions? If no difference was found, was the sample size large enough to detect a difference if one existed? If a difference was found, are you confident it was due to the intervention? Are the findings consistent with findings from other studies? Some No ARE THE FINDINGS CREDIBLE? Clinical Significance (6 pts.) 2. Note any difference in means, r2s, or measures of clinical effects (ABI, NNT, RR, OR) Answer Here