History > QUESTIONS & ANSWERS > Southern New Hampshire UniversityHIS 200 TERM 17-2 Short Responses-Hist 200 (All)

Southern New Hampshire UniversityHIS 200 TERM 17-2 Short Responses-Hist 200

Document Content and Description Below

Module 7 Short Responses – Question 1 Name three historical lenses that you could apply to gain a fuller picture of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Be sure to respond to this ... question in two to three sentences, using proper grammar. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 2 Revise the thesis statement at the top of this page to reflect a more complex view of the relationship between Natives and white settlers. Your revised thesis statement should be longer than one sentence. . Module 7 Short Responses – Question 3 Name three historical lenses that you could use to look at the events described in the video you just saw. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 4 Massasoit's decision to approach the Pilgrims about an alliance was contingent on what previous event or events? (Name one or two.) Module 7 Short Responses – Question 5 Name one short-term consequence and one long-term consequence of the alliance between the Wampanoag and the Pilgrims. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 6 How has your understanding of the historical event in your essay changed as a result of your research? Describe one instance of a misconception or a wrong idea you had about your topic that has been corrected after researching and writing about it. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 7 Name four historical lenses through which you could analyze the events of the Cherokee Removal. Specify one aspect of this event for each lens that you cite. Module 7 Short Responses – Question 8 Agree or disagree with the following thesis statement: "The Treaty of New Echota was invalid, and the National Party was correct to oppose it." Cite at least three historical facts that support your position. [Show More]

Last updated: 2 years ago

Preview 1 out of 3 pages

Buy Now

Instant download

We Accept: