Nursing 6512 - Week 10 Assignment.(Complete Guide, Rated 100%)

Document Content and Description Below

Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum Nursing 6512N – Adv. Health Assessment & Diagnostic Reasoning Nursing 6512 - Week 10 Assignment. Introduction Nurse practitioners will be fac ... ed with a wide range of cases that require a reserve of learning and mastery. Evaluating the genitalia and influencing a clinical conclusion when a patient presents with ambiguous subjective data can be difficult. Practitioners must be stellar with correspondence and evaluation aptitudes that will give the objective information needed to determine the appropriate diagnosis. This paper will dismember the subjective and the objective information introduced and recommend extra data that should be incorporated into this area of the SOAP note, as proved by references of current insightful literature. Also, current proof from literature will be displayed, analytic tests that would be imperative to assess, as well as subjective information from the patient will be recorded with references to either bolster or disprove this evaluation. As medical professionals, analytic tests must be upheld with clinical support about why it is relevant to the right diagnosis. At last, I will distinguish three conceivable conclusions to consider and put forth my defense for accepting or dismissing every finding, including the present diagnosis of choice. Analysis of Subjective Data History of Present Illness (HPI): AB, a 21-year-old white female, undergraduate student reports to the facility with outer bumps on her genital area. She expresses the bumps are not painful and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had in excess of one sexual partner over the previous year. Her underlying sexual contact happened at age 18. She reports no unusual vaginal release. She is uncertain to what extent the bumps have been there yet seen them about seven days prior. Her last Pap smear exam was three years prior, and no dysplasia was discovered; the exam results were ordinary. She reports one sexually transmitted disease (chlamydia) around two years back. She finished the treatment for chlamydia as endorsed. Past Medical History (PMH): Asthma Medications: Symbicort 160.4.5mcg Allergies: NKA Family History: Denies any history of breast/cervical cancer. Father has a history of HTN, and GERD. Social History: Denies any tobacco or illicit drug use. She occasionally uses alcohol, she is married with 3 children (2 boys and 1 girl). Analysis of Objective Data The practitioner that played out this objective appraisal, completed a concise head to toe evaluation with a concentrated evaluation on the genital region. In any case, there are fundamental frameworks that are missing, for example, neurological and mental. This patient is a 21­year­old female and could conceivably show anxiety about this examination which could hinder her psychological status. Support/Refuse Assessment Diagnostic Tests Differential Diagnoses In this segment I will list somewhere around 3 conceivable findings, with contentions for accepting or dismissing each, as upheld by the present proficient literature. 1. Chancre This differential finding is satisfactory in this patient’s case because of the way that the patient has bumps on her outer labia. Likewise, chancres are common in ladies who have numerous sexual partners. Portrayal of initial periods of syphilis incorporate the presence of a solitary chancre denotes the essential (first) phase of syphilis indications, yet there might be various wounds as this patient has in her labia (Mochtar, et al, 2017). The trademark presentation of a chancre is typically firm, round, and painless which is the thing that the patient reports subjectively. These chancres last about three to six week and heal in any case if the patient gets treatment. Be that as it may, if not treated, this can deteriorate into (Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs). Analytic testing for syphilis incorporate the accompanying: positive nontreponemal test (e.g., fast plasma reagin/Venereal Disease Research Laboratories titer, darkfield microscopy result) or a positive treponemal serology test. RPR test would demonstrate positive and would be affirmed by serology for Treponema pallidum (Mochtar, et al, 2017). 2. Chancroid This differential finding is dismissed because of the way that chancroids present as a solitary profound ulcer and the patient expresses that it is excruciating. Besides, the patient would likewise grumble about a burning sensation on the ulceration which isn't expressed above (Mochtar, et al, 2017). The patient’s current subject manifestations for the situation ponder states that the bumps are painless and feel rough. This information alone would reject the determination of chancroid. Furthermore, if a PCR was performed for diagnostics it would demonstrate Haemophilus ducreyi on a culture (Mochtar, et al, 2017). 3. Herpes Simplex Virus This differential afinding would be rejected on the grounds that as per the contextual investigation the patient does not have tingling, burning without sores and basic manifestations seen of herpes labialis incorporate tingling and burning and afterward successive idevelopment of vesicular then ulcerative injuries that are in the oropharynx and perioral mucosa. There is no proof recommending that the patient has vesicular sores in her oropharynx or mucosa and the patient does not have subjective indications of ingling and burning (Mochtar, et al, 2017). In conclusion, recognizable proof of 3 differential findings and the acknowledgment of the analysis of chancre was talked about in this paper. Intensive examination of subjective and objective information from this contextual analysis was talked about alongside suitable indicative tests. As health care providers, the way to proper diagnoses is stellar patient evaluation and emotional information accumulated from the past medicinal history. References DeLellis, D., & Yen, G. (2017). A Case of Non­infectious Genital Ulceration. Proceedings of UCLA Healthcare, 21. Kim, D. W., Kwak, H. B., Yun, S. K., Kim, H. U., & Park, J. (2016). P282: Mutiple oral and genital syphilic chancre. 프로그램북 (구 초록집), 68(1), 400­401. Mochtar, M., Murasmita, A., Irawanto, M. E., & Elistasari, E. Y. (2017). Genital Ulcers in Women with HIV Proposed Revision on Management Algoritm. American Journal of Life Sciences, 5(3), 93­96. Raleigh, M., & Allan, H. (2017). A qualitative study of advanced nurse practitioners' use of physical assessment skills in the community: shifting skills across professional boundaries. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 26(13­14), 2025­2035. Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs). (2017, February 13). Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/syphilis/stdfact­syphilis­detailed.htm Shah , A.N., & Kantharia, B.K. (2017, January 23). Acute atrial fibrillation. San Mateo, CA : Epocrates, Inc.. Retrieved August, 2, 2017 from www.epocrates.com Workowski, K. A., & Bolan, G. A. (2015). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR. Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports, 64(RR­03), 1. [Show More]

Last updated: 3 years ago

Preview 1 out of 9 pages