Philosophy > QUESTIONS and ANSWERS > PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint text exam questions and answers new solution 2021 (All)

PHIL 347 Week 6 Checkpoint text exam questions and answers new solution 2021

Document Content and Description Below

What are the three fundamental reasoning strategies listed in the text? What is comparative reasoning? On what skill is it based? We learned four tests for evaluating arguments: truthfulness of the pr... emises, logical strength, relevance, and non-circularity. How well do these tests work with respect to evaluating comparative reasoning? Consider each of the four tests. What are the five criteria for evaluating comparative reasoning? Name and define them in your own words. According to the text, the basic question to ask when evaluating a comparison between two objects or ideas or events is “Are they alike enough in the important ways or not?” (p. 248). What are those “important ways” that determine the credibility of conclusions based on similarities? In your own words, define empirical reasoning. What are the three defining characteristics of empirical reasoning? What is meant by “the null hypothesis”? What is the purpose of empirical reasoning? How do we evaluate empirical reasoning? What part of a research design addresses the test for logical strength, and how is it addressed? Briefly explain the process of peer review. What is the process of peer review designed to do? The authors of our text state: “We have 40 years of data across multiple studies that confirm the positive correlation between taking a course in critical thinking and improvements in the students’ pretest to post-test critical thinking skills scores. It would be a mistake, therefore, all things being equal, to say that growth in critical thinking and taking a course in critical thinking are unrelated” (p. 290). The null hypothesis is false. Does that mean, therefore, that taking a critical thinking course causes students to become more skilled at critical thinking and more motivated to use those skills? Explain your answer. If reasoning is empirical, contains statistics, and appears in print, should we take for granted that it has passed the four tests of truthfulness of the premises, logical strength, relevance, and non-circularity? Explain your answer. [Show More]

Last updated: 2 years ago

Preview 1 out of 13 pages

Buy Now

Instant download

We Accept:

We Accept
document-preview

Buy this document to get the full access instantly

Instant Download Access after purchase

Buy Now

Instant download

We Accept:

We Accept

Reviews( 0 )

$3.00

Buy Now

We Accept:

We Accept

Instant download

Can't find what you want? Try our AI powered Search

90
0

Document information


Connected school, study & course


About the document


Uploaded On

Dec 22, 2021

Number of pages

13

Written in

Seller


seller-icon
ACADEMICTUTORIAL

Member since 4 years

23 Documents Sold

Reviews Received
3
0
0
0
2
Additional information

This document has been written for:

Uploaded

Dec 22, 2021

Downloads

 0

Views

 90

Document Keyword Tags

More From ACADEMICTUTORIAL

View all ACADEMICTUTORIAL's documents »

$3.00
What is Scholarfriends

In Scholarfriends, a student can earn by offering help to other student. Students can help other students with materials by upploading their notes and earn money.

We are here to help

We're available through e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, and live chat.
 FAQ
 Questions? Leave a message!

Follow us on
 Twitter

Copyright © Scholarfriends · High quality services·