Summary PHI 413V Topic 3 Assignment; Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative Applying the Four Principles: Case Study 2022.

Document Content and Description Below

Applying the Four Principles: Case Study Part 1: Chart (60 points) Based on the “Healing and Autonomy” case study, fill out all the relevant boxes below. Provide the information by means of bul... let points or a well-structured paragraph in the box. Gather as much data as possible. Medical Indications *Beneficence and Nonmaleficence  The dialysis treatment is necessary to relieve James’s elevated blood pressure and to minimize the fluid buildup.  Delays in treatment have caused James to rely on dialysis and will need a kidney transplant within a year.  The only compatible donor is his twin brother Patient Preferences *Autonomy  The medical profession apprised the parents of all information and the recommended treatment while also respecting their religious beliefs. Quality of Life *Beneficence, Nonmaleficence, Autonomy  If James’s had gotten medical treatment right away as was recommended by the Physician, his kidneys would have been restored.  Autonomy applies to this situation, meaning James must receive a kidney transplant This study source was downloaded by 100000861165608 from CourseHero.com on 01-29-2023 05:35:10 GMT -06:00 https://www.coursehero.com/collection/121749213/PHI-413V-0503-Topic-3-AD-Case-Study-on-Biomedical-Ethics-in-the-Christian-Narrativedocx/ Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative 1  James's twin brother Samuel is a perfect match and can save his brother's life.  Mike is worried about endangering one son for the health of his other son. Contextual Features *Justice and Fairness  Mike struggles with the fairness of allowing one son to suffer for the other son and the risk of them only having one kidney. Part 2: Evaluation Answer each of the following questions about how the four principles and four boxes approach would be applied: In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how would each of the principles be specified and weighted in this case? Explain why. (45 points) The way principles are specified and balanced in any given case scenario is also determined by prior moral commitments (Grand Canyon University, 2020). When it comes to beneficence, receiving dialysis will relieve James's condition and without it, his health will decline resulting in a kidney transplant within a year. His twin brother (Samuel) is the only donor match. Beneficence allows for weighty deliberation because Samuel can save his brother, lose his own life, or they both could lose their life. Autonomy ensures that the medical professional respects the parents' freedom to choose based on their faith. Nonetheless, their faith did not help their son, and the waiting for results allowed for his condition to worsen to the point that he will require a kidney transplant to live. A person's faith is important but sometimes can get in the way of lifesaving procedures. Nonmaleficence focuses on having a better quality of life and stresses the importance of dialysis. James's condition has now worsened so a kidney transplant must happen This study source was downloaded by 100000861165608 from CourseHero.com on 01-29-2023 05:35:10 GMT -06:00 https://www.coursehero.com/collection/121749213/PHI-413V-0503-Topic-3-AD-Case-Study-on-Biomedical-Ethics-in-the-Christian-Narrativedocx/ Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative 1 right away. Harm will befall him if he does not receive a transplant. Samuel may be harmed by donating this kidney. Making patients aware of treatment is essential and required. Justice must be evenly balanced between the medical benefits, the risks, and the costs. Mike has a hard choice to make that may endanger both of his kids. In 200-250 words answer the following: According to the Christian worldview, how might a Christian balance each of the four principles in this case? Explain why. (45 points) The Christian worldview provides a comprehensive basis for holding together three aspects of ethical reflection: direction for Christian living (the character of God as reflected in his will and commands), motive and character of Christian living (as reflected in the love of God and the fruit of the Spirit), and the goal of Christian living (to seek God’s kingdom while glorifying him and enjoying him forever) (Grand Canyon University, 2020). Ultimately, it is of utmost importance to find better decisions versus bad decisions. With autonomy, the medical professional is required to inform the parents of the benefits and risks of any treatment. The parents must make choices for their son because of their age. Nonmaleficence means that harm comes to no one. The parents believed that through their faith a kidney would be available within a year for transplant.. If a donor cannot be found, their other son can donate the kidney. The parents should have allowed the dialysis to minimize the condition and avoid needing a kidney transplant. They are accepting of the transplant because it will save their sons' life. Beneficence calls for Christians to support each other. Therefore, according to the Christian view, Samuel can donate one of his kidneys because he is helping his fellow man. Due to his age, his parents will decide. Justice and fairness must be upheld because the patient deserves to be treated fairly. From a Christian view, each This study source was downloaded by 100000861165608 from CourseHero.com on 01-29-2023 05:35:10 GMT -06:00 https://www.coursehero.com/collection/121749213/PHI-413V-0503-Topic-3-AD-Case-Study-on-Biomedical-Ethics-in-the-Christian-Narrativedocx/ Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative 1 individual patient must receive the same level of care, compassion, and dignity. The medical provider treats his/her patients to the best of their ability. Comparatively, parents must make fair decisions for their children. [Show More]

Last updated: 2 years ago

Preview 1 out of 6 pages