Economics > A-Level Mark Scheme > OCR GCSE ECONOMICS J205/01: INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS MARK SCHEME JUNE 2023 (All)

OCR GCSE ECONOMICS J205/01: INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS MARK SCHEME JUNE 2023

Document Content and Description Below

OCR GCSE ECONOMICS J205/01: INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMICS MARK SCHEME JUNE 2023 OCR (Oxford Cambridge and RSA) is a leading UK awarding body, providing a wide range of qualifications to meet the needs ... of candidates of all ages and abilities. OCR qualifications include AS/A Levels, Diplomas, GCSEs, Cambridge Nationals, Cambridge Technicals, Functional Skills, Key Skills, Entry Level qualifications, NVQs and vocational qualifications in areas such as IT, business, languages, teaching/training, administration and secretarial skills. It is also responsible for developing new specifications to meet national requirements and the needs of students and teachers. OCR is a not-for-profit organisation; any surplus made is invested back into the establishment to help towards the development of qualifications and support, which keep pace with the changing needs of today’s society. This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and students, to indicate the requirements of the examination. It shows the basis on which marks were awarded by examiners. It does not indicate the details of the discussions which took place at an examiners’ meeting before marking commenced. All examiners are instructed that alternative correct answers and unexpected approaches in candidates’ scripts must be given marks that fairly reflect the relevant knowledge and skills demonstrated. Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the published question papers and the report on the examination. © OCR 2023 J205/01 Mark Scheme June 2023 6 12. Subject Specific Marking Instructions Levels of response / Level descriptors Knowledge and understanding Application Analysis Evaluation Good Good knowledge and understanding of the theory stated or referred to in the question. All the terms/theoretical concepts are explicitly or implicitly understood. Good application of knowledge to a given scenario. The terms/theoretical concepts are used/adapted/changed in the context of the given scenario. There is good understanding of all the relevant elements of the scenario. Good analysis of the effect of xxxx. There is correct analysis in the form of developed links. These links are developed through a chain of reasoning which addresses the question. Any relevant diagram(s) are predominantly correct and linked to the analysis. Good evaluation with a fully supported judgement that is developed from a weighing up arguments/both sides/comparing alternatives. Reasonable Reasonable knowledge and understanding of the theory stated or referred to in the question. Most of the terms/theoretical concepts are explicitly or implicitly understood. Reasonable application of knowledge to a given scenario. The terms/theoretical concepts are used/adapted/changed in the context of the given scenario. There is understanding of some the relevant elements of the scenario. Reasonable analysis of the effect on xxxx. There is correct analysis largely in the form of single effects. These address the question but are not developed into a clear chain of reasoning. The relevant diagram(s), if present, may be improperly labelled or not linked to the analysis. Reasonable evaluation of xxx considering arguments/both sides/comparing alternatives. There may be a judgement, but this will not be fully supported. Limited Limited knowledge and understanding of the theory stated or referred to in the question. Some of the terms/theoretical concepts are explicitly or implicitly understood. Limited application of knowledge to a given scenario. There is an attempt to use/adapt/change the terms/theoretical concepts in the context. Limited analysis of the effect on xxxx. There is an attempt at analysis which may include a single effect that has some link to the question. Diagrams (if present) are unlikely to be correct and not linked to the analysis. Limited evaluation of xxx that may include an incomplete consideration of arguments/both sides/comparing alternatives with unsupported statements. [Show More]

Last updated: 1 year ago

Preview 1 out of 28 pages

Buy Now

Instant download

We Accept:

We Accept
document-preview

Buy this document to get the full access instantly

Instant Download Access after purchase

Buy Now

Instant download

We Accept:

We Accept

Reviews( 0 )

$8.50

Buy Now

We Accept:

We Accept

Instant download

Can't find what you want? Try our AI powered Search

75
0

Document information


Connected school, study & course


About the document


Uploaded On

Feb 21, 2024

Number of pages

28

Written in

Seller


seller-icon
Tiara

Member since 2 years

18 Documents Sold

Reviews Received
0
0
1
0
2
Additional information

This document has been written for:

Uploaded

Feb 21, 2024

Downloads

 0

Views

 75


$8.50
What is Scholarfriends

In Scholarfriends, a student can earn by offering help to other student. Students can help other students with materials by upploading their notes and earn money.

We are here to help

We're available through e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, and live chat.
 FAQ
 Questions? Leave a message!

Follow us on
 Twitter

Copyright © Scholarfriends · High quality services·