NURSING > CASE STUDY > Jack Holmes _ Sepsis Shock Case Study (2)_2022 | NURS 342 Sepsis Shock Case Study (2) (All)

Jack Holmes _ Sepsis Shock Case Study (2)_2022 | NURS 342 Sepsis Shock Case Study (2)

Document Content and Description Below

Sepsis Shock Case Study part 2 History of Current Problem: Jack Holmes a 72-year-old Caucasian male brought to the ED by ambulance from a skilled nursing facility (SNF). According to report from the paramedic, when the SNF nursing staff attempted to wake him this morning, he would not respond, and his BP was 74/40 with a MAP of 51. He has a history of Parkinson’s disease, COPD, CHF, HTN, depression, and a stage IV decubitus ulcer on his coccyx that developed three months ago. He does not follow commands, is unresponsive to verbal stimuli, but responds to a sternal rub with grimacing and withdrawing from stimulus. Personal/Social History: He has lived in the skilled nursing facility the past three years and has been bed bound the past year due to his advanced Parkinson’s disease. He was a heavy smoker, 1 PPD for 40 years until he moved to the SNF. 1. What is the RELATIONSHIP between RELEVANT current problem data and the primary medical problem? RELEVANT Current Problem Data: Clinical Significance Low BP with MAP of 51 Stage 4 Ulcer on his coccyx that developed 3 months ago COPD, CHF, HTN, Parkinson’s disease and old age Unresponsiveness to verbal stimuli Hypoperfusion of the tissue which can hinder oxygenation Ulcer not healing due to inadequate tissue perfusion Altered immune response due to these comorbidities and lowered functioning immune system given the patient’s age. Altered LOC RELEVANT From Social History: Clinical Significance Skilled Nursing Facility Bed bound due to his parkinson’s Depression More exposure to pathogens or iatrogenic illness at the facility Poor skin integrity, atrophy of muscle, renal calculi, DVT, isolation Isolation, no interest or motivation in performing ADLs, unable to self advocate, withdrawing from peers Patient Care Begins Current VS P-Q-R_S-T Pain Assessment T: 103.4 F/39.7 C (oral) Provoking /palliative Not responsive verbally, withdraws to pain, no other indicators of pain P: 135 (irregular) Quality R: 32 (regular) Region/radiation BP: 76/39 MAP: 51 Severity O2 Sat: 91% 2 liters n/c Timing 2. What VS data are RELEVANT and must be interpreted as clinically significant by the nurse? RELEVANT VS Data Clinical Significance Temperature is high Respiration is high BP is low O2 Sat is low (91%) There is an active infection in the body, this can also cause higher metabolism which can lead to fatigue Compensating for low BP inorder to adequately oxygenate the tissues This is an indication of septic shock Could be normal for a patient with COPD who is

[Show More]

Last updated: 3 years ago

Preview 1 out of 13 pages

Buy Now

Instant download