Georgia Institute Of Technology : CS 7641 | Hypothesis Quiz Selected Answers Summer 2025.

Document Content and Description Below

Hypothesis Quiz Selected Answers Summer 2024 CS7641: Machine Learning Prepared by: Theodore J. LaGrow Last Updated: 05/29/25 The following are curated answers generated by the Teaching Staff for the... article, “Robust T-Loss for Medical Image Segmentation” by Gonzalez-Jimenez et al. I have tried to highlight key details needed for each question. These answers are examples in no particular order. Question 1 Much like Rule 6 in Ten simple rules for structuring papers by Konrad Kording and Brett Mensh, what is the gap the authors provide? Please provide 400 words or less. • For this question, we are really looking for what the author’s claim for the gap as well as some explanation for why this is the gap. For full completeness, you need to give explanation or evidence. Question 2 What is the hypothesis of the article? Please provide 100 words or less. • For this question, you need to state the hypothesis for which the authors pose a question and their predicted outcome. Evidence will help support the hypothesis prediction. Question 3 What specifics from article do you personally need to look up for understanding of claims? How will this information provide context to the claims? This can include background, notation, and citations. Please provide 400 words or less. • For this question, we will give points more often than not. This is an exercise to help you go look up specific citations, math notation, or even assumed concepts. We do not expect the full word limit to be used, but we hope that the few examples you state will have some explanation to help further your understanding. The is a fine line between diving into the rabbit hole of citations and understanding the current paper. Question 4 After reviewing and re-reviewing the article, what limitation did do discern? These can be simple or more complex observations. Please provide reasoning in 400 words or less. • This is the heart of the assignment. To be critical while reading is an important skill to develop. Even though this article is highly recognized at a top conference, there are always connotations and limitations to the paper. Science and engineering cannot be done in a vacuum. For these answers, we are looking for reasoning behind the limitations you present. You want to be concise rather than harsh and overbearing. Below are some examples from the Teaching Staff. Responses: Question 5 What might be next steps to further this research? There is no correct answer here, however your answer must be grounded in reasoning. Please then provide a hypothesis on what you'd like to investigate based on the knowledge gained in this exercise. Be concise with detail. Limit full response to 400 words. • This question is looking for a hypothesis for further research you’d conduct after reading the article. What sparks your interest? Having evidence or a direction will help support your hypothesis. [Show More]

Last updated: 3 months ago

Preview 1 out of 13 pages