Sport and Exercise psychology - ANSWER scientific study of people and their behaviors in sport and exercise contexts/practical application of that knowledge
Two Objectives of Sport/Exercise Psychology - ANSWER - Under
...
Sport and Exercise psychology - ANSWER scientific study of people and their behaviors in sport and exercise contexts/practical application of that knowledge
Two Objectives of Sport/Exercise Psychology - ANSWER - Understand how psychological factors affect an individual's physical performance
- Understand how participation in sport affects person's psychological development
Behavior Function - ANSWER B=f(P,E)
Behavior is a function of the person and environment
Ways of Knowing: Pros and Cons - ANSWER 1. Common Sense
Strengths = easy, quick
Limitations: not based on experience or data, great chance of being wrong
2. Practical Experience
Strengths: holistic, immediate, innovative
Limitations: fails to explain mechanisms, susceptible to bias
3. Science
Strengths: reliable, objective
Limitations: reductionistic, slow to evolve, not always practical
Periods of Sport Psych - ANSWER 1) Early Years - decided the field was worth investigating, psychology was somewhat new
2) Griffith Era - Coleman Griffith, first Sports Psychologist, lab at University of Illinois, studies athletes there
3) Preparation for the Future - Franklin Henry establishes grad program,
4) Establishment of Academic Branch - 1st NAPSPA conference, build upon other's knowledge
5) Multidisciplinary Research
6) Current Era
Norman Triplett - ANSWER studied social facilitation of bikers, whether they rode faster with others around
Coleman Griffith - ANSWER father of modern sport psych, made 1st research lab
ABC's of sport psych - ANSWER A - affect (how we feel)
B- behavior (effort/motivation/performance)
C- cognition (why do people choke, self-referential thoughts)
Affect vs. Emotion vs. Mood - ANSWER Affect: how we feel generally, positive vs. negative
Emotion: combination of affect and behavior, directed at particular stimulus
Mood: how we express emotion/affect
Hollander's Model of Personality - ANSWER Psychological core: most basic/deepest level (attitudes, values, interests, beliefs), most stable
Typical Responses: how we respond to environment
Role-related behavior: how we act based on perceptions/situation, may conflict behaviorally
Psychodynamic Approach - ANSWER freud, emphasis on unconscious determinants, id ego and superego, understand as a whole rather than isolated traits, not commonly used anymore
Trait Approach - ANSWER traits are consistent (behavior similar from one situation to next) and generalizable (behave similarly across contexts).
CON: weak predictor of behavior, people don't always act the same way
Situation Approach - ANSWER behavior determined by situation or environment, learn behavior via rewards and punishments.
CON: doesn't consider traits, simplistic
Social Learning Theory - ANSWER people learn behaviors for certain situations via observational learning/modeling
Interactional Approach - ANSWER situation and traits together lead to behavior (B=f(P,E)),
Phenomenological Approach - ANSWER similar to interactional approach however considers person's understanding and subjective interpretations of oneself and environment
motivation - ANSWER direction (seeking out situations) and intensity (how much) of effort
Interactional View - ANSWER how traits and situations work together to form motivational behaviors
achievement motivation - ANSWER orientation to strive for success, persist in face of failure, and take pride in achieving excellence
Need Achievement Theory - ANSWER interactional view that consists of personality and situational factors (probability of success vs. incentive value), resultant tendencies, emotional reactions, and achievement- related behaviors
Attribution Theory - ANSWER focuses on how people explain their successes and failures
Stability: attributes are permanent or unstable
Causality: factor either internal or external
Control: factor either under or not under control
Attribution - ANSWER reason for why something happened
Achievement Goal Theory - ANSWER goals, perceived ability, and achievement behavior determine motivation
Underlying assumptions:
1. people are motivated to demonstrate competence
2. motivation is influenced by personal meaning to perceived success/failure
Outcome goal orientation - ANSWER comparing oneself with and defeating others, great it win, bad if lose (entity view)
Task Goal Orientation - ANSWER focus on improving relative past own performance (incremental focus)
Competence Motivation Theory - ANSWER people are motivated to feel worthy
1. Perceptions of control work along with self-worth and competence evaluations
2. perceptions of control do not influence motivation directly
3. perceptions influence affective/emotional states -> influence motivation
Learned Helplessness Theory - ANSWER perceiving actions to have no effect on desired outcome of a task or skill, felling doomed to failure, controllable and stable
Self-serving bias - ANSWER making attributions that help you increase or maintain confidence
For success = internal and stable
For failure = external and unstable
Ego/Outcome vs. Task/Mastery - ANSWER Ego/Outcome - being better than others. Task/Mastery - being better than your previous self. Independent of each other
ex: Low Task Low ego = not very motivated, but not much negative affect
Task Goal Involvement - ANSWER choosing learning opportunities at risk of displaying mistakes, high effort, resistance to failure
Ego Goal Involvement - ANSWER avoid learning opportunities at risk of displaying error, put in just enough effort to socially compare well, give up in face of failure
Undifferentiated concept of ability - ANSWER cannot differentiate between ability and effort. working hard = ability
Mastery vs. Perfomance Climate - ANSWER Mastery = emphasis on learning/individual improvement, evoke task involvement. Performance = emphasis on competition, winning, evoke ego involvement
TARGET - ANSWER conditions to promote mastery climate
-Task
-Authority
-Recognition
-Grouping
-Evaluation
-Timing
autonomous competence - ANSWER children focus on mastering environments through self-testing, not looking to compare to others
social comparison - ANSWER competence motivation stage 2, children focus on comparing their performance with that of others
integrated state - ANSWER competence motivation stage 3, involves both social comparison and autonomous achievement strategy
Self-Determination Theory Article Main Point - ANSWER social environments facilitate or forestall intrinsic motivation by supporting/thwarting innate needs
*People only motivated for activities that have intrinsic interest, appeal of novelty
General Self-Worth Components - ANSWER Physical, Emotional, Social, Academic
Self Concepts - ANSWER 1. Multidimensional
2. hierarchical
3. influenced by others
4. information used to inform self-perceptions is developmentally influenced
Stress - ANSWER relationship between person and environment, viewed as exceeding resources, dynamic (means we intervene), transactional (intervention can occur in person or environment)
arousal - ANSWER blend of physiological and psychological activity in a person, intensity of motivation at a particular moment, good or bad
anxiety - ANSWER negative emotional state of nervousness
Thought component = cognitive anxiety
Physiological component = somatic anxiety
State vs. Trait Anxiety - ANSWER State = temporary, depending on situation
Trait = part of personality, predisposition
Primary vs. Secondary Appraisal - ANSWER Primary = what is at stake
Secondary = what can be done
coping - ANSWER changing cognitive/behavioral efforts used to manage demands (problem vs emotion focused)
external regulation - ANSWER performing an activity to receive a reward or avoid a punishment
introjected regulation - ANSWER performing a behavior to avoid guilt and anxiety
Identified regulation - ANSWER performing behavior to achieve some valued, extrinsic outcome
Integrated regulation - ANSWER performing a behavior because it is part of your sense of self
Intrinsic Motivation - ANSWER performing an activity for its own sake
Encourage Self-Determined Motivation through... - ANSWER Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness
Cognitive Evaluation Theory - ANSWER critical factor is now reward, but person's perception of reward
Controlling aspect: affects autonomy perceptions
Information aspect: affects competence perceptions
Drive Theory - ANSWER as arousal or state anxiety increases, so does performance
Social Facilitation Theory - ANSWER presence of others helps performance on learned skills and inhibits performance on unlearned skills
Inverted U Hypothesis - ANSWER at low arousal levels, performance will be below par. Performance increases until optimal point, then decreases again
IZOF - ANSWER Individualized Zones of Optimal Functioning, optimal state anxiety (bandwidth, not necessarily in middle, differs from one to another
Catastrophe Phenomenon - ANSWER physiological arousal is related to performance in an inverted U fashion, only when athlete isn't worried
Reversal Theory - ANSWER arousal affects performance based on interpretation of arousal
Competition - ANSWER social process occurs when rewards are given to people on the basis of comparing performances, someone else knows criteria
Cooperation - ANSWER social process through which performance is evaluated and rewarded in terms of collective achievements, does NOT ignore individual, success = player's individual improvement
Zero-Sum - ANSWER rewards distributed unequally, not everyone can win
feedback - ANSWER information obtained about a behavior, intrinsic (internal) vs. augmented (external), functions to inform, motivate and reinforce
Reinforcement vs. Punishment - ANSWER Reinforcement - increases likelihood of a behavior
Punishment - decreases the likelihood of a behavior
Positive vs. Negative - ANSWER Positive = add stimulus
Negative = decrease stimulus
both used for reinforcement and punishment
Positive Approach - ANSWER AIM: strengthen desired behavior by motivating participants to perform them, reinforce behavior
FOCUS: correct performance
Key Elements: praise, encouragement, and instruction
Negative Approach - ANSWER AIM: Eliminate undesirable behaviors through punishment and criticism
FOCUS: performance errors or negative behaviors
Key Problem: fear of failure
Horn Study (1985) - ANSWER Purpose: examined relationship between coach behaviors and player perceptions of competence/expectancy of success
Results: more positive reinforcement -> lower perceptions of competence/expectations, more criticism -> higher competence perceptions/expectations
Modeling/Observational Learning - ANSWER cognitive, affective, and behavioral changes resulting from observing others
Skill/Behavior acquisition - ANSWER acquire motor coordination information, develop strategies to solve movement problems
Inhibition vs. Disinhibition - ANSWER Inhibition = induce anxiety
Disinhibition = gain confidence
Weiss, McCullach, Smith and Berlant (1998) - ANSWER Purpose: examine effect of peer coping and mastery models on children's motor performance and psychological responses in
Results: no differences between modeling groups
Social Learning Theory 4 Processes - ANSWER Attention, Retention, Motor Reproduction, Motivation
Interpersonal Communication - ANSWER Meaningful exchange between 2 people
Intrapersonal communication - ANSWER communication with ourselves, self-talk
Sandwhich Approach - ANSWER 1. Positive, sincere statement (finding something done correctly)
2. Corrective information (future-oriented instructions)
3. Positive encouraging remark (compliment)
Confrontation - ANSWER face-to-face discussion in conflict, NOT always a negative thing (can lead to better understanding) Convey importance of relationship and understand other's perspective, don't say solution without dis
[Show More]