WGU D002 Drill Questions and Answers
Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) ✔✔The Supreme Court ruled that "separate is not
equal" and that education must be made available to all children on equal terms.
Honig v.
...
WGU D002 Drill Questions and Answers
Brown v. Topeka Board of Education (1954) ✔✔The Supreme Court ruled that "separate is not
equal" and that education must be made available to all children on equal terms.
Honig v. Doe ✔✔Court ruled that students with disabilities could not be excluded indefinitely if
misbehavior is "disability related."
Endrew F. v Douglas County School District ✔✔2017 (8-0 decision) ruled in favor of a higher
standard of education for children with disabilities. - Chief Justice Roberts' majority opinion
stated that a child's "educational program must be appropriately ambitious in light of his
circumstances" and that "every child should have the chance to meet challenging objectives."
Daniel R. R. v State Board of Education ✔✔One of the important cases that opened the door to
increased inclusion of children with disabilities in regular education classes.
Irving Independent School v Tatro ✔✔Local Education Agency (LEA) is required to provide
required related services regardless of the expense if such services can be provided by a nonphysician (catheter)
Board of Henrick Hudson Central School District v Rowley
June 28, 1982 ✔✔Determined that appropriate is not necessarily an optimal educational
experience.
Larry P. v Riles ✔✔Case Ruled that IQ test could not be used as the primary or sole basis of
placing students in special programs
Mills v Board of Education of the District of Columbia ✔✔The court ruled that the lack of funds
is not an excuse for failing to provide services to students with disabilities.
PARC vs. commonwealth of PA ✔✔accessibility for education
Diana v California State Board of Education
1970 ✔✔Students cannot be placed in special education based on culturally biased IQ tests.
Group-administered IQ tests cannot be used for SPED eligibility determination
Hobson v Hanson ✔✔Court ruled against tracking based on IQ tests.
[Show More]
.png)
.png)
