WGU D002 Case Laws Questions and
Answers Graded A
Brown v. Topeka Board of Education ✔✔Supreme court ruled that education must be available
to all children on equal terms. Separate is not Equal.
9-0 vote
Hobsen v. H
...
WGU D002 Case Laws Questions and
Answers Graded A
Brown v. Topeka Board of Education ✔✔Supreme court ruled that education must be available
to all children on equal terms. Separate is not Equal.
9-0 vote
Hobsen v. Hansen ✔✔stated IQ tests were culturally biased; ruled against track system based on
IQ testing
Diana v. California State Board of Education ✔✔requires that schools provide tests to students
in their first language or by means that doesn't require English fluency
PARC v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ✔✔All children with disability right to FAPE.
Because segregation based on race was deemed unconstitutional, segregation based on disability
is also unconstitutional
Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia ✔✔lack of funding is not a good enough
reason to not provide SPED to qualifying students
Larry P. v. Riles ✔✔Case Ruled that IQ test could not be used as the primary or sole basis of
placing students in special programs; led to multi-tiered SPED evaluation process
Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson School System v. Rowley ✔✔school is required to
provide FAPE based on students needs, not more expensive services at parent request beyond
FAPE
Irving Independent School District v. Tatro ✔✔Forced schools to provide non- physician
required medical services to allow a physically impaired student to attend school
Honig v. Doe ✔✔students who misbehavior is related to their disability can not be denied
education
Daniel R.R. v. State Board of Education ✔✔-1989
-redefined the definition of least restricted environment along with appropriate (some students
need to be taught in self-contained classes)
Florence County School Dist 4 v. Shannon Carter
Forest Grove School Dist v. TA ✔✔parents entitled to reimbursement if they were denied FAPE
and had to enroll their child in a private school
Endrew F. v Douglas County School District ✔✔in favor of a higher standard of education for
children with disabilities. - stated that a child's "educational program must be appropriately
ambitious in light of his circumstances" and that "every child should have the chance to meet
challenging objectives."
[Show More]