Question 1
1. 3
2. 2
3. 4
4. 1
5. 3
6. 1
7. 4
8. 3
9. 4
10.1
Question 2
(i) The unwritten nature of African customary law(5)
Originally, African customary law was not recorded in written legal sources such a
...
Question 1
1. 3
2. 2
3. 4
4. 1
5. 3
6. 1
7. 4
8. 3
9. 4
10.1
Question 2
(i) The unwritten nature of African customary law(5)
Originally, African customary law was not recorded in written legal sources such as
statutes, law reports or textbooks. Court procedures were conducted orally, and the
law was also transmitted orally from one generation to the next. This process of legal
transmission was furthered by the public participation of adult men in particular in the
administration of justice. The result, therefore, was that the community had a broad
general knowledge of the law. To a large extent, important legal principles were
expressed by means of legal maxims.
(ii) The customary nature of African customary law (5)
7Most indigenous legal systems in Africa are the result of age-old traditions and
customs that, in the course of time, came to be classified as “law”. There are also
examples of laws promulgated by chiefs. These laws were mainly limited to direct
orders and instructions from the ruler.
8Formal administration of justice was also known, but the indigenous court’s function
was limited to the application, and not the creation, of law. Furthermore, a system
according to which indigenous courts were bound to their previous decisions or to
the decisions of a higher court was unknown in indigenous African law. In other
words, the indigenous courts had no system of precedent. (“Precedent”means that a
court’s decision sets a precedent or example that must be followed in similar cases
by courts of the same order or by courts of a lower order.)
(iii) Customary law as an expression of community values (5)
9Public participation in the process of adjudication resulted in the law also giving
expression to the prevalent values or the general moral behavioural code of the
community. As values changed in the course of time, so did the law. Conflict between
legal and moral values was therefore unknown.
In a dispute between parties, usually family groups, the emphasis was not on which
party was right and which party was wrong. The dispute affected the wider
community, which meant that any decision had to take into account future relations
between the parties within the community. These relations were extremely important
if the wider community was to enjoy harmony. Thus, the administration of justice did
not concern legal justice as such, but the reconciliation of people (“human” justice).
As a result, the interests of the community were considered so important that, in the
eyes of the law, the individual had no special part to play. The individual did,
however, have a role to play within the group, that is within the family on the one
hand and within the community on the other.
(iv) The role of magico-conceptions of African customary law (5)
[Show More]