Business > CASE STUDY > CH Module 6 Case Analysis.docx CH-6 Case Analysis of Lucy v. Zehmer Southern New Hamp (All)
CH Module 6 Case Analysis.docx CH-6 Case Analysis of Lucy v. Zehmer Southern New Hampshire University Business Law I Reviewing the case of Lucy v. Zehmer, and the sale of Ferguson Farms, the co... ntractual element Zehmer contended was missing was that of mental assent. Zehmer (the seller and defendant) argued that he was drunk and the agreement to sell the property was done jokingly. Zehmers contention to mental assent is void as it is not a legal requisite of both parties for the creation of a contract. The evidence which included the actions of Zehmer along with the disclosure in court that drinking did occur but not to an extent that they were unable to fully understand what they were doing showed that Lucy (the plaintiff) was justified in believing the contract represented a valid business transaction and a good faith sale and purchase of the farm. The trial court ruled with the defendant (Zehmer) that the con. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [Show More]
Last updated: 2 years ago
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
Buy this document to get the full access instantly
Instant Download Access after purchase
Buy NowInstant download
We Accept:
Can't find what you want? Try our AI powered Search
Connected school, study & course
About the document
Uploaded On
Jun 15, 2021
Number of pages
3
Written in
This document has been written for:
Uploaded
Jun 15, 2021
Downloads
0
Views
73
In Scholarfriends, a student can earn by offering help to other student. Students can help other students with materials by upploading their notes and earn money.
We're available through e-mail, Twitter, Facebook, and live chat.
FAQ
Questions? Leave a message!
Copyright © Scholarfriends · High quality services·