Instructions: Work through each step of this log, answering each question as the directions indicate. Step
1 is not graded. Steps 2 through 5 will each receive a grade, and the sum of these grades will constitute
your
...
Instructions: Work through each step of this log, answering each question as the directions indicate. Step
1 is not graded. Steps 2 through 5 will each receive a grade, and the sum of these grades will constitute
your total grade for Research Log Project Part 2. Refer to the section on how each step of the log will be
graded for detailed grading information.
Step 1: Thinking Back to Research Log Project Part 1
A. Research Question
Record your research question from Research Log Project Part 1 (Step 1) in the box below.
How does fast food contribute to obesity in children?
B. Original Boolean Search Statement
Record your original search statement from Research Log Project Part 1 (Step 3) in the box below.
(fast food OR junk food OR processed food) AND (obesity OR overweight OR chubby) AND (children
OR adolescent OR juvenile)
How will Step 1 be graded?
Step 1 will not receive a grade.
Step 2: UMUC Library Database Search
A. Database Search
Use the search statement you recorded in Step 1, Part B to search in one of the following UMUC library
databases:
Academic Search Complete
MasterFILE Premier
Which database did you search?
AcademicSearchComplete
Hint: Refer to Week 2 for a review of UMUC library databases.
B. Review Search Results
Review the search results from the database search you performed in Step 2, Part A and answer all of the
following questions:
This study source was downloaded by 100000829219024 from CourseHero.com on 08-15-2021 08:37:56 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/17774786/Research-Log-Project-2-LIBS-150-7377-Introduction-to-Research-2168/
This study resource was
shared via CourseHero.com
Were you able to successfully use the search statement from Step 1, Part B in the database, or did you
receive an error/search failed message when trying your search?
Yes
If you received an error/search failed message from the database, were you able to identify the problem
with your search statement?
NA
Did you have to revise the search statement you created in Step 1, Part B in order to retrieve search results
in the database search you performed in Step 2, Part A?
No
In the box below, identify and list additional keywords that you may use to search further on this topic by
reviewing article titles, article abstracts, subject headings, and the articles themselves.
Hint: Refer to Week 2 for a review of databases, including subject headings in databases.
behavioral patterns hypertension' physical inactivity weight education diet food patterns consumption
C. Revised Search Statement
Review your instructor's comments from Research Log Project Part 1 for ways to improve your search
statement. Review the additional keywords you identified in the box above (in Step 2, Part B). Based on
this information, enter a revised search statement in the box below, using more effective search terms and
techniques.
Hint:The revised search statement must be different in some way than the search statement that you used
in Research Log Project Part 1 (Step 3) and recorded above in Step 1, Part B. Review the hints and
examples in Research Log Project Part 1. For example, you might add, subtract, or change alternative
search terms, or you might alter your use of truncation to discover more focused, relevant results. Refer to
Week 1 for a review of Boolean operators, search statements, and advanced searching techniques..
(fast food OR consumption OR food patterns) AND (obesity OR physical inactivity OR weight
education) AND (adolescent OR hypertension OR behavioral patterns)
How will Step 2 be graded?
Unsatisfactory (0–2 points): Does not list alternative relevant keywords, or the search statement
is not revised, or both.
Satisfactory (3–4 points): The revised search statement is adequate and demonstrates some
appropriate advanced searching techniques correctly, but does not incorporate instructor
feedback from Research Log Project Part 1 or choice of alternative keywords does not reflect
careful review of search results.
Excellent (5 points): Lists alternative relevant keywords that demonstrate the student reviewed
article titles, abstracts, subject headings, and articles. The search statement is effectively
revised based on both instructor feedback from Research Log Project Part 1 and database search
results from Step 2 and expertly demonstrates advanced searching techniques.
This study source was downloaded by 100000829219024 from CourseHero.com on 08-15-2021 08:37:56 GMT -05:00 Instructor Comments
https://www.coursehero.com/file/17774786/Research-Log-Project-2-LIBS-150-7377-Introduction-to-Research-2168/
This study resource was
shared via Cour
[Show More]